![]() ![]() A chrononaut whose body is defined by mass would still have a gravitational effect, and be dark matter. The potential for photons to possess mass by having their digital sequence altered and being converted to other particles – or the potential for programming the photons - may make this definition possible. But perhaps a well-defined structure can be built if the photons are first stopped. Force-carrying particles like photons and gravitons do not obey the exclusion principle so we might assume the immaterial body wouldn’t be well-defined and would collapse into a ghostly soup. Protons and neutrons would do the same, and there would be no well-defined atoms. If two electrons could have identical positions and velocities, they could all collapse into a roughly uniform, dense “soup”. This says two similar particles cannot have both the same position and velocity. - From “Physics and Philosophy Beyond the Standard Model” () – “In 1925, the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli discovered the exclusion principle. The preceding agrees with Zen Buddhism's idea of intuitively getting in touch with your inner self. And if the physical brain is receptive to this so-called entangled soul’s knowledge of everything in space and time, the presently accepted limits to acquiring knowledge would, to use the below quote of Einstein’s, be “superfluous”). I’m wondering about something I later wrote – could the ghostly immaterial body described below be what we call the soul? If such a body is developed in the future to overcome present limitations, could it be referred to as a soul if it travels into the past and is absorbed into a physical body? (It might be what the Bhagavad Gita refers to as the Supersoul, and might be quantum entangled with all space and all time. The idea of having a reincarnating soul would be an easy way of explaining immortality thousands of years ago when people were completely unfamiliar with the scientific facts of an eternal universe, Einstein’s Unified Field, and fractal geometry.” I still think this might be correct. I said, “However, the concept of possessing a soul is not automatically supported. - There’s a statement in the essay which I’m wondering about. ) entry for what it is – a naïve attempt to preach science to the religionists, as well as a naïve attempt to preach religion to the scientists. The winner has been announced and I can now see my (. For a while, I actually considered it possible that I’d win the contest. I was attracted to the contest because the website included a very favourable comment about the Bhagavad Gita by Albert Einstein (see below). ![]() ![]() Probably written about 2,000 years ago this writing is perhaps the greatest philosophical expression of Hinduism. This is an essay I entered in a competition about the Bhagavad Gita. This paper will reveal the strategy for determining holistic art forms containing the 21st century icon that Pauli understood would arise from under the collapsed quantum wave. The goal is the embodiment of Jean Gebser’s 360-degree aperspectival awareness, whereas the shadow is contacted and absorbed into the very body of art. Her (R)evolution series for the Huffington Post places the containment of the hieros gamos at the forefront of contemporary art practice. As her functional role as newspaper critic shifted to a more esoteric passage as performance artist/curator/blogger, the author spent 14 years theorizing and another 14 years applying a new critical theory to contemporary art. ) collapsed quantum wave is sourced in an ancient icon: the hieros gamos. The configuration predicted by Pauli as arising from under the (. This new paper uncovers a new critical theory in the form of a formula that has been successfully applied to a universal appraisal of arts across all boundaries, whether they be gender, discipline or culture. “Applying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle to 21st Century Art” was delivered to the 2009 Congress of the International Association of Art Critics (AICA) in Dublin as a guide to critical thinking through a paradigm shift.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |